Zero Identity Forums - General - Security - decode me
Are you bored? Check out the unaswered threads!
|
swiftnomad
![]() Administrator Public Relations ZI Guru Joined: 04.04.2008 Last Seen: 10 year(s) ago Experience: 3274.18 Points: 405 |
|
| #1 decode me on May 13 2009 15:39 | |
|
Code Highlighting :: Select Code Clients websites have a lot of encrypted code and hidden iframes and all of them are reported attack sites. Im trying to figure out what all this encrypted shit is. Code Highlighting :: Select Code I figured out some of it. the base64 was easy.. Code Highlighting :: Select Code but i dont get it. USER: Hello Tech Support? I can't print... ME: Try cursive then <hang up> |
|
|
pyr0t3chnician
![]() Member Too Legit Professional Analyst Joined: 04.01.2009 Last Seen: 10 year(s) ago Experience: 455.88 Points: 545 |
|
| #2 Too Legit on May 14 2009 22:25 | |
|
The first javascript stuff says this. The funciton takes is variable qlX (which is a period),then it replaces the .'s with % signs in the huge string and creates the script in unescape. Hope that helps somewhat in your decoding.
Code Highlighting :: Select Code unless I am reading this wrong, it makes j = "ScriptEngineMajorVersion()+ScriptEngineMinorVersion()+ScriptEngineBuild+"j;" I have no idea what the code does besides checking user agent stuff and your cookies for miek=1. EDIT: found this site, has lots of info on gumblar.cn: http://blog.unmaskparasites.com/2009/05/07/gumblar-cn-exploit-12-facts-about-this-injected-script/ Sounds like this malicious little bugger moves you over to the gumblar.cn website, forces a PDF file download with an Adobe exploit, then searches for your FTP clients, grabs stored passwords, sends them home, then logs on to those ftp sites, and modifies your files.
|
|
|
tancurrom
![]() Administrator Nibble Advanced Analyst Joined: 03.04.2008 Last Seen: 10 year(s) ago Experience: 501.5 Points: 450 |
|
| #3 on May 15 2009 13:34 | |
|
Yeah you got that somewhat. The string jkX is already escaped and also has the % replaced by periods to obfuscate it more, it holds the script that runs.
The code that is then evaluated only runs if you are using windows (not NT), the cookie miek isn't 1 and zrvzts isn't a string. The second eval evaluates to this. Code Highlighting :: Select Code I think it's basically fetching the local version number of the hack so it can be passed to their servers so they return the right exploit code to run, maybe log it as well. Ultimately you end up executing this... (were 000 is the version number) Code Highlighting :: Select Code Setting the cookie miek=1 will prevent the script running as a quick fix. @pyr0t3chnician That link made me chuckle. Facts 2.1 and 2.2 are consistent with most scripts I write, they're kind of invalid points. |
|
|
pyr0t3chnician
![]() Member Too Legit Professional Analyst Joined: 04.01.2009 Last Seen: 10 year(s) ago Experience: 455.88 Points: 545 |
|
| #4 on May 15 2009 21:45 | |
|
So here's a question. Its all over the net that this malicious script is hosted by gumblar.cn, so why don't they get shut down?
My friend owns a hosting/reseller company, and when someone reports something as little as spam from one of his clients servers, he shuts it down until they fix the problem. If someone is intentionally doing this, he straight up deletes their account. Also on a side note, he was pretty pissed this past weekend. Someone hacked into one of his major servers through SSH and deleted 75 VPS accounts on the partitions, all in about 5 minutes. He had to tell those clients they lost their databases, their backups, and pretty much everything that was stored on their VPS, so they weren't too happy. I told him to quit pissing off hackers and accept their fraudulent credit cards when they try to purchase a dedicated server.
|
|
Who is watching forums
| Users viewing this page: | Guests (1) |
| Users viewing the forum: | 1 |









